|

Influential as perhaps no other analyst since Freud himself,
Jacques Lacan was born in Paris in 1901, took up the study of medicine
in 1920 and specialised in psychiatry from 1926. In 1932 he completed
his doctoral thesis: “Paranoid Psychosis and its Relations to the
Personality”. He began his analysis around this time with Rudolph
Loewenstien and this continued until 1938. A friend of Andrè Breton,
Salvador Dali and Picasso, Lacan was very active in the world of
Parisian writers, artists and intellectuals of the time; he made
contributions to several Surrealist publications and was present at the
first public reading of James Joyce’s ‘Ulysses’. Instead of
confining himself in his studies to the standard texts in psychiatry and
psychoanalysis, Lacan read widely and with a particular interest in the
philosophic work of Karl Jaspers and Martin Heidegger; alongside many
other Parisian intellectuals of the time, he also attended the famous
seminars on Hegel given by Alexandre Kojève.
Lacan presented his first paper on ‘The Mirror Phase’ at
the 1936 Congress of the International Psychoanalytical Association in
Marienbad. He was called up
to serve in the French army after the German occupation of France and
was posted to the Val-de-Grâce military hospital in Paris.
After
the end of the war Lacan visited England for a five week study trip,
meeting English analysts Wilfred Bion and John Rickman. He was much
influenced by Bion’s analytic work with groups and this contributed to
Lacan’s own later emphasis on study groups (in France, Cartels) as a
structure with which to advance theoretical work in psychoanalysis.
Lacan’s
conclusions from this time are collected in the 1947 paper ‘English
Psychiatry and the War’.
In 1951 Lacan started to hold a weekly seminar in Paris
urging what he described as ‘a return to Freud’ and, in particular,
to Freud’s concentration upon the linguistic nature of psychological
symptomatology. Massively influential in Parisian cultural life as well
as in psychoanalytic theory and clinical practice, the seminars drew
great crowds and continued for nearly thirty years.
In 1953, Lacan and many of his colleagues - disagreeing with
the standardisation of practice methods they saw in the organisation -
left the Société Parisienne de Psychanalyse (SPP) to form the new
group Société Française de Psychanalyse (SFP). One of the
consequences of this move was to deprive the group of membership within
the International Psychoanalytical Association (IPA). In the following
years a complex process of negotiation was to take place to determine
the status of the new group. Lacan’s innovative practice and the
critical stance he took towards the standardisation of psychoanalysis
led, in 1963, to a condition being set by the IPA that registration of
the SFP was dependant upon Lacan being removed from the list of training
analysts with the organisation. Lacan refused such a condition and left
to form his own school which became know as the École Freudienne de
Paris (EFP). Leaving the
St-Anne Hospital where he had delivered his seminar up to this point
Lacan began to give it instead at the elite higher education
establishment the École Normale Supérieur. To an audience of
colleagues who had joined him from the SFP and attracting the brightest
of the École Normale’s students Lacan was now free to give voice to
the radical and original of nature of psychoanalytic insight in an
undiluted form. This,
Lacan’s groundbreaking 1964 seminar, was later published in English as
‘The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis’.
Lacan continued to deliver his public revitalisation of
analytic theory and practice for the next twenty-seven years, and his
regular seminars are now becoming available in English translation.
Lacanian
work is an established feature of the psychoanalytic tradition in
France, Belgium, Argentina, Spain and many other European and
non-European countries. It has been estimated that about half the
world’s analytic population (of approximately 20,000 practitioners)
are trained in Lacanian frameworks, although in many countries they
represent either more or less than this average. In Britain, although
Lacanian psychoanalysis was initially appropriated by film and literary
theory, its importance for clinical work has been progressively
recognised. Many of those involved in CFAR have done a first training in
other forms of psychotherapy or psychoanalysis, and have come to
appreciate the clinical significance of Lacanian ideas for their
practice. Indeed, nearly all the Lacanian groups operating today have
close links with clinical institutions. |